Differences in Trocar Positioning within the Vertebral Body Using Two Different Positioning Methods : Effect on Trainee Performance
Joint Authors
Yamakado, Kyoichiro
Fujikawa, Atsuko
Tamura, Taiji
Sawada, Satoshi
Yagihashi, Kunihiro
Nakamura, Kenji
Koike, Yuya
Ogawa, Yukihisa
Tanigawa, Noboru
Koizumi, Jun
Nakajima, Yasuo
Komemushi, Atsushi
Takahashi, Makoto
Yoshimatsu, Misako
Takizawa, Kenji
Kariya, Shuji
Tanaka, Norimitsu
Yoshioka, Tetsuya
Hirota, Shozo
Kuribayashi, Sachio
Uejima, Iwao
Nakatsuka, Seishi
Source
Radiology Research and Practice
Issue
Vol. 2011, Issue 2011 (31 Dec. 2011), pp.1-5, 5 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2011-12-08
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
5
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Purpose.
To evaluate the educational effect of the Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology 7th Academic Summer Seminar from a technical perspective.
Materials and Methods.
Nineteen trainees participated in the seminar.
The seminar consisted of vertebroplasty trainings using swine with the single-plane landmark method and with the ISOcenter Puncture (ISOP) method.
All trainees were advised by an instructor as they operated the instruments and punctured the vertebra.
For each trainee, the accuracy in the final position of the needle tip of the initial puncture in each swine training was evaluated.
Results.
Error in the final position of the needle tip of ≥5 mm from the target puncture site occurred in the lateral direction in 42% (8/19) of trainees with the landmark method and 5% (1/19) with the ISOP method.
No error ≥5 mm occurred in the vertical or anteroposterior directions.
In terms of puncture accuracy, error in the lateral direction was significantly lower with the ISOP method than with the landmark method (2.2 ± 1.5 mm versus 5.6 ± 3.2 mm).
Conclusion.
This seminar was effective training for trocar placement for beginners.
The puncture was more accurate with the ISOP method than with the landmark method.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Komemushi, Atsushi& Takizawa, Kenji& Tanaka, Norimitsu& Yoshimatsu, Misako& Yagihashi, Kunihiro& Ogawa, Yukihisa…[et al.]. 2011. Differences in Trocar Positioning within the Vertebral Body Using Two Different Positioning Methods : Effect on Trainee Performance. Radiology Research and Practice،Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-501610
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Komemushi, Atsushi…[et al.]. Differences in Trocar Positioning within the Vertebral Body Using Two Different Positioning Methods : Effect on Trainee Performance. Radiology Research and Practice No. 2011 (2011), pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-501610
American Medical Association (AMA)
Komemushi, Atsushi& Takizawa, Kenji& Tanaka, Norimitsu& Yoshimatsu, Misako& Yagihashi, Kunihiro& Ogawa, Yukihisa…[et al.]. Differences in Trocar Positioning within the Vertebral Body Using Two Different Positioning Methods : Effect on Trainee Performance. Radiology Research and Practice. 2011. Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-5.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-501610
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-501610