Revisiting the Sham : Is It all Smoke and Mirrors?

Joint Authors

Gold, Jeffrey I.
Balk, Judith
Horn, Brandon

Source

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Issue

Vol. 2011, Issue 2011 (31 Dec. 2011), pp.1-4, 4 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2011-04-14

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

4

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

The misuse of sham controls in examining the efficacy or effectiveness of Complementary and Alternative Medicine has created numerous problems.

The theoretical justification for incorporating a sham is questionable.

The sham does not improve our control of bias and leads to relativistic data that, in most instances, has no appropriate interpretation with regards to treatment efficacy.

Even the concept of a sham or placebo control in an efficacy trial is inherently paradoxical.

Therefore, it is prudent to re-examine how we view sham controls in the context of medical research.

Extreme caution should be used in giving weight to any sham-controlled study claiming to establish efficacy or safety.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Horn, Brandon& Balk, Judith& Gold, Jeffrey I.. 2011. Revisiting the Sham : Is It all Smoke and Mirrors?. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine،Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-502632

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Horn, Brandon…[et al.]. Revisiting the Sham : Is It all Smoke and Mirrors?. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine No. 2011 (2011), pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-502632

American Medical Association (AMA)

Horn, Brandon& Balk, Judith& Gold, Jeffrey I.. Revisiting the Sham : Is It all Smoke and Mirrors?. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2011. Vol. 2011, no. 2011, pp.1-4.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-502632

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-502632