A Real World Report on Intravenous High-Dose and Non-High-Dose Proton-Pump Inhibitors Therapy in Patients with Endoscopically Treated High-Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

Joint Authors

Chuah, Seng-Kee
Kuo, Chung-Mou
Lin, Sheng-Chieh
Kuo, Chung-Huang
Chang, Kuo-Chin
Lu, Lung-Sheng
Tai, Wei-Chen
Tseng, Po-Lin

Source

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Issue

Vol. 2012, Issue 2012 (31 Dec. 2012), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2012-07-11

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

Background and Study Aims.

The optimal dose of intravenous proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for the prevention of peptic ulcer (PU) rebleeding remains controversial.

This study aimed to understand the real world experiences in prescribing high-dose PPI and non-high-dose PPI for preventing rebleeding after endoscopic treatment of high-risk PU.

Patients and Methods.

A total of 220 subjects who received high-dose and non-high-dose pantoprazole for confirmed acute PU bleeding that were successfully treated endoscopically were enrolled.

They were divided into rebleeding (n=177) and non-rebleeding groups (n=43).

Randomized matching of the treatment-control group was performed.

Patients were randomly selected for non-high-dose and high-dose PPI groups (n=44 in each group).

Results.

Univariate analysis showed, significant variables related to rebleeding were female, higher creatinine levels, and higher Rockall scores (≧6).

Before case-control matching, the high-dose PPI group had higher creatinine level, higher percentage of shock at presentation, and higher Rockall scores.

After randomized treatment-control matching, no statistical differences were observed for rebleeding rates between the high-dose and non-high-dose groups after case-control matching.

Conclusion.

This study suggests that intravenous high-dose pantoprazole may not be superior to non-high-dose regimen in reducing rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful endoscopic therapy.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Lu, Lung-Sheng& Lin, Sheng-Chieh& Kuo, Chung-Mou& Tai, Wei-Chen& Tseng, Po-Lin& Chang, Kuo-Chin…[et al.]. 2012. A Real World Report on Intravenous High-Dose and Non-High-Dose Proton-Pump Inhibitors Therapy in Patients with Endoscopically Treated High-Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding. Gastroenterology Research and Practice،Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-503930

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Lu, Lung-Sheng…[et al.]. A Real World Report on Intravenous High-Dose and Non-High-Dose Proton-Pump Inhibitors Therapy in Patients with Endoscopically Treated High-Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding. Gastroenterology Research and Practice No. 2012 (2012), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-503930

American Medical Association (AMA)

Lu, Lung-Sheng& Lin, Sheng-Chieh& Kuo, Chung-Mou& Tai, Wei-Chen& Tseng, Po-Lin& Chang, Kuo-Chin…[et al.]. A Real World Report on Intravenous High-Dose and Non-High-Dose Proton-Pump Inhibitors Therapy in Patients with Endoscopically Treated High-Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2012. Vol. 2012, no. 2012, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-503930

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-503930