Benchmarking B-Cell Epitope Prediction with Quantitative Dose-Response Data on Antipeptide Antibodies : Towards Novel Pharmaceutical Product Development

Abstract EN

B-cell epitope prediction can enable novel pharmaceutical product development.

However, a mechanistically framed consensus has yet to emerge on benchmarking such prediction, thus presenting an opportunity to establish standards of practice that circumvent epistemic inconsistencies of casting the epitope prediction task as a binary-classification problem.

As an alternative to conventional dichotomous qualitative benchmark data, quantitative dose-response data on antibody-mediated biological effects are more meaningful from an information-theoretic perspective in the sense that such effects may be expressed as probabilities (e.g., of functional inhibition by antibody) for which the Shannon information entropy (SIE) can be evaluated as a measure of informativeness.

Accordingly, half-maximal biological effects (e.g., at median inhibitory concentrations of antibody) correspond to maximally informative data while undetectable and maximal biological effects correspond to minimally informative data.

This applies to benchmarking B-cell epitope prediction for the design of peptide-based immunogens that elicit antipeptide antibodies with functionally relevant cross-reactivity.

Presently, the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) contains relatively few quantitative dose-response data on such cross-reactivity.

Only a small fraction of these IEDB data is maximally informative, and many more of them are minimally informative (i.e., with zero SIE).

Nevertheless, the numerous qualitative data in IEDB suggest how to overcome the paucity of informative benchmark data.