A Comparison of Radical Perineal, Radical Retropubic, and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomies in a Single Surgeon Series

Abstract EN

Objective.

We sought to compare positive surgical margin rates (PSM), estimated blood loss (EBL), and quality of life outcomes (QOL) among perineal (RPP), retropubic (RRP), and robot-assisted laparoscopic (RALP) prostatectomies.

Methods.

Records from 463 consecutive men undergoing RPP (92), RRP (180), or RALP (191) for clinically localized prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed.

Age, percent tumor volume, Gleason score, stage, EBL, PSM, and QOL using the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) were compared.

Results.

PSM were similar when adjusted for stage, grade, and volume.

EBL was significantly less in the RALP (189 ml) group compared to both RPP (475 ml) and RRP (999 ml) groups.

When corrected for nerve sparing, there were no differences in erectile function and sexual function amongst the three groups.

Urinary summary and pad usage scores showed no significant differences.

Conclusion.

RPP, RRP, and RALP offer similar surgical and QOL outcomes.

RALP and RPP demonstrate less EBL compared to RRP.