A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Two Novel Desensitising Dentifrices

Abstract EN

A comparison of the desensitising efficacy of two commercially available dentifrices with different modes of action was conducted in a randomised, examiner-blind, two-arm, parallel group, 8-week, longitudinal clinical study.

Dentifrice A, (Sensodyne Multi Action Iso-Active), contained 50000 ppm KNO3 and 1450 ppm fluoride as NaF.

Dentifrice B, Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief, contained a combination of 80000 ppm arginine, bicarbonate, calcium carbonate, and 1450 ppm fluorine as NaMFP.

Subjects (N=110), stratified into two groups (N=55), brushed twice-daily for 60 s, over an 8-week period.

Sensitivity status, compliance, and safety were determined at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks.

A fixed-effects ANCOVA statistical model was applied to the Intent-To-Treat population using a two-sided 5% significance level.

After 8 weeks, the treatment groups using Dentifrice A and Dentifrice B exhibited mean reductions from baseline of 49% and 45% in air sensitivity visual analogue scale (VAS) score, 61% (both) in examiner-based Schiff Sensitivity score, and clinically significant reductions in tactile pain threshold; all reductions were statistically significant (P<0.0001).

Both treatment groups also exhibited significant reductions across all sensitivity measures at 1, 2, and 4 weeks (P≤0.0059, Dentifrice A; P≤0.0137, Dentifrice B).