Living donor nephrectomy : open vs laparascopy renal function and complications

Joint Authors

Mourani, Chebl
Moukarzel, Maroun
Chemaly, Anthony Kallas
Rahhal, Samir
Awn, Fuad
Nakhlah, Fuad
Mallat, Samir
Ata Allah, David

Source

Journal Médical Libanais

Issue

Vol. 63, Issue 3 (30 Sep. 2015), pp.144-149, 6 p.

Publisher

Lebanese Order of Physicians

Publication Date

2015-09-30

Country of Publication

Lebanon

No. of Pages

6

Main Subjects

Medicine

Topics

Abstract EN

This study is to compare the short and long-term renal function between adult recipients of living laparoscopic and open donors (LR vs OR) to highlight the effect of the surgical technique on graft function.

Moreover, we chose to compare the organic (hypertension, proteinuria, serum creatinine) and psychological (aspect of libido, need for anxiolytics) long-term effect of the surgery between laparoscopic and open donors (LD vs OD).

Methods: After census of adult recipients and living donors between 2003 and 2012, and after application of exclusion criteria and selection of homogeneous groups of donors and recipients, a retrospective cohort study was conducted between October 2008 and January 2012.

In recipients, renal function in the short term was reported by the value of serum creatinine at ± D5 post-op and the long-term values of serum creatinine at 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Delayed graft function was defined by a serum creatinine value ≥ 2.5 mg/dl on D5 post-op.

A questionnaire for donors was established.

Results: The two groups OR and LR were homogeneous concerning age, sex and body mass index (BMI).

Different groups OD and LD, chosen according to the variable of interest, were made homogeneous.

Despite a different warm ischemia time between the 2 groups (175.54 seconds in LR vs 44.67 seconds in OR, p < 0.001), renal function in the short- and long-term in recipients was not statistically different (At day 5, 1.54 vs 1.50 mg/dl, p = 0.781; at 6 months, 1.37 vs 1.38, p = 0.871; at 12 months, 1.34 vs 1.36, p = 0.569, in OR and LR respectively).

Similarly, there was no significant statistical difference concerning organic and psychological complications between OD and LD except for a shorter period between hospital discharge and return to work in LD.

Conclusion: In our center, renal function in the shortand long-term was similar in OR and LR.

Apart from the advantages offered by the laparoscopic technique, organic and psychological long-term effects were similar between OD and LD.

Nevertheless, laparoscopy seemed to facilitate kidney donation and is requested by almost all living donors independently of their social status.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Moukarzel, Maroun& Chemaly, Anthony Kallas& Rahhal, Samir& Awn, Fuad& Nakhlah, Fuad& Ata Allah, David…[et al.]. 2015. Living donor nephrectomy : open vs laparascopy renal function and complications. Journal Médical Libanais،Vol. 63, no. 3, pp.144-149.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-644996

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Moukarzel, Maroun…[et al.]. Living donor nephrectomy : open vs laparascopy renal function and complications. Journal Médical Libanais Vol. 63, no. 3 (2015), pp.144-149.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-644996

American Medical Association (AMA)

Moukarzel, Maroun& Chemaly, Anthony Kallas& Rahhal, Samir& Awn, Fuad& Nakhlah, Fuad& Ata Allah, David…[et al.]. Living donor nephrectomy : open vs laparascopy renal function and complications. Journal Médical Libanais. 2015. Vol. 63, no. 3, pp.144-149.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-644996

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 144-149

Record ID

BIM-644996