I-gel against proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during minor surgical procedures : a comparative study

Joint Authors

Zanfali, Hala E.
Hasan, Ali M. Ali

Source

Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology

Issue

Vol. 8, Issue 4 (31 Dec. 2015), pp.521-528, 8 p.

Publisher

Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

Publication Date

2015-12-31

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Topics

Abstract EN

Background I-gel is the second generation of supraglottic airway devices with a noninfl atable cuff that has several potential advantages over other supraglottic airway devices.

Objective The aim of this study was to compare I-gel with proseal laryngeal mask airway ( PLMA) and endotracheal tube ( ETT) during elective minor surgical procedures using controlled ventilation Design and setting A prospective, randomized, comparative study.

Patients and methods A total of 60 adult female patients ASA I–II scheduled for elective breast lumpectomy surgery under general anesthesia with positive pressure ventilation were divided equally into three groups (20 patients each): group I used I-gel, group II used PLMA, and group III used ETT for airway maintenance.

The three devices were compared with regard to the insertion characteristics, the ease of gastric tube insertion, tidal volumes, leak volumes, airway sealing pressures, hemodynamics, gas exchange parameters, and postoperative airway complications.

Results The mean insertion time for I-gel (9.8 ± 2.5 s) was signifi cantly shorter than that of PLMA (15.4 ± 3.2 s) and ETT (14.1 ± 2.1 s) (P < 0.001).

The I-gel group (19/20) and the ETT group (18/20) showed a signifi cantly easier insertion compared with the PLMA group (13/20) (P < 0.05).

There was a signifi cant increase in the mean arterial blood pressure after the insertion of the airway device in the ETT group (110 ± 13 mmHg) compared with the I-gel group (100 ± 10 mmHg) and the PLMA group (102 ± 11 mmHg) (P < 0.05).

There was a signifi cantly lower incidence of hoarseness, nausea, regurge, vomiting, and dysphagia in the I-gel and the PLMA groups when compared with the ETT group.

Conclusion I-gel is an effective alternative device to PLMA and ETT during minor surgical procedures using controlled ventilation as it produces minimal hemodynamic changes, less airway morbidity, and is rapid and easy to insert.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Zanfali, Hala E.& Hasan, Ali M. Ali. 2015. I-gel against proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during minor surgical procedures : a comparative study. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology،Vol. 8, no. 4, pp.521-528.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-655432

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Zanfali, Hala E.& Hasan, Ali M. Ali. I-gel against proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during minor surgical procedures : a comparative study. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology Vol. 8, no. 4 (Oct. / Dec. 2015), pp.521-528.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-655432

American Medical Association (AMA)

Zanfali, Hala E.& Hasan, Ali M. Ali. I-gel against proseal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube during minor surgical procedures : a comparative study. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015. Vol. 8, no. 4, pp.521-528.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-655432

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 527-528

Record ID

BIM-655432