النظام القانوني لاستجواب الخصوم و دوره في الإثبات المدني : دراسة مقارنة

Other Title(s)

He legal system to interrogate opponents and his role in the civil evidence : a comparative study

Dissertant

الصبح، حاتم علي محمد

Thesis advisor

الحوامدة، أحمد محمد

Comitee Members

المنصور، أنيس أحمد
اليعقوب، ربحي أحمد عارف
الفواعير، علاء محمد علي

University

Jerash University

Faculty

Faculty of Law

University Country

Jordan

Degree

Master

Degree Date

2016

English Abstract

Interrogation and means of proof in the case, resorted to discount to get the approval of his opponent incident in dispute, or resorted to him the court to uncover the truth and show it, and the interrogation be during the proceedings, and be on the facts contained in the lawsuit, and then decide that the Court finds that it is not to waste time, but rather be of grandparents in the resolution of the dispute after the confirmation of productivity in the lawsuit and has the necessary conditions.

Interrogation be from the court, and liability and may be resorted to in the stage, it turned out the suit, and be directed to the litigants in the lawsuit, or legal Naibhm, and law arranges the impact and results as provided by the opponent of the answers to the questions directed to him by the court, if approved the provisions of the discount applied to him to admit, and if the opponent does not deny the consequent discount any trace.

Most of the Arab legislations organized interrogation in detail, but the Jordanian legislator in the Evidence Act did not provide for interrogation as a way to prove, and provided for in the Civil Procedure Law are not detailed, and did not indicate the measures, or the provisions of the interrogation.

In this study, Pena interrogation, and types, and its purpose, and the statement of its procedures, and how it is done, and the effects that result from the questioning, and we have addressed shortcomings in the Jordanian legislation wishing to Musharana taking the results that we have reached, the most important grant opponents the right of interrogation and also arrange legislator effects on interrogation to achieve the goal of it.

Main Subjects

Law

Topics

No. of Pages

217

Table of Contents

فهرس المحتويات / الموضوعات.

الملخص / المستخلص.

المستخلص باللغة الإنجليزية.

المقدمة.

الفصل الأول : ماهية الاستجواب.

الفصل الثاني : أحكام الاستجواب.

الخاتمة.

قائمة المراجع.

American Psychological Association (APA)

الصبح، حاتم علي محمد. (2016). النظام القانوني لاستجواب الخصوم و دوره في الإثبات المدني : دراسة مقارنة. (أطروحة ماجستير). جامعة جرش, الأردن
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-678581

Modern Language Association (MLA)

الصبح، حاتم علي محمد. النظام القانوني لاستجواب الخصوم و دوره في الإثبات المدني : دراسة مقارنة. (أطروحة ماجستير). جامعة جرش. (2016).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-678581

American Medical Association (AMA)

الصبح، حاتم علي محمد. (2016). النظام القانوني لاستجواب الخصوم و دوره في الإثبات المدني : دراسة مقارنة. (أطروحة ماجستير). جامعة جرش, الأردن
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-678581

Language

Arabic

Data Type

Arab Theses

Record ID

BIM-678581