السببية بين المعتزلة و الأشاعرة

Abstract EN

Th e research on the subject of causation of important topics in the history of philosophy in general and (slamic philosophy and especially to discuss the issue of causation or attic is as old as philosophy or to transfer presented the beginnings of thinking and research about the raison d’etre .or reason to exist Not without a philosophy of research on the subject of causation since the philosophies of the ancient Near East through the philosophers of Greece and led by Aristotle, who initially the subject of causation is particularly important in the interpretation of the ills of the four through Islamic philosophy, which discussed the subject of causation in the context of the Islamic faith and in the context of the nature of the difference intellectual among Islamic sects each other.

Th is is what prompted me to select the subject of causality between Mutaziil Ash'aris as an indicator of the variation in the different point of view, philosophical between team embraced for himself through pure reason and the other team committed Pttadhaq use absolute mind and put it in the context of a specific commensurate with their point of v iew on its doctrine, especially in denied Ash'aris headed Ghazali to the idea of a causal arguing that nrtaintaining the miracles of God and also In the context of maintaining the principles of ai-A sh 'a ri thinking that G od is the creator of everything.

Users analytical and critical approach to achieving the goals of the research and to clarify the fact that the essence of the dispute between the Mulazili Ash'aris a serious issue and that the causal crowd baffled philosophers and speakers