Efficacy of sacral epidural blockade with bupivacaine versus morphine as pre-emptive analgesia for lumbar laminectomy surgeries

Joint Authors

Husayn, Id Mansi Muhammad
Muhammad, Jihan Sayf al-Nasr
al-Shair, Ahmad Najah al-Husayni
Abd al-Aziz, Abd al-Aziz Abd Allah
Muharram, Asim Adil

Source

Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology

Issue

Vol. 9, Issue 2 (30 Jun. 2016), pp.260-266, 7 p.

Publisher

Ain Shams University Faculty of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

Publication Date

2016-06-30

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Objectives Patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy experience severe pain in the postoperative period, which may increase the incidence of postoperative morbidity and complications.

Adequate pain relief hastens rehabilitation and decreases the incidence of chronic pain.

This study was designed to compare the effi cacy of pre-emptive image-guided caudal epidural blockade with bupivacaine at low concentrations versus morphine administration on the attenuation of the stress response during and after lumbar laminectomy surgeries.

Patients and methods Ninety adult American Society of Anaesthesiologists’ physical status I and II patients were scheduled to undergo a single-level lumbar laminectomy and were administered a pre-emptive caudal injection of either 30 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% (group A) or 50 μg/kg preservativefree morphine added to a total dose of 30 ml saline (group B) or 30 ml saline (group C).

Intraoperative vital data (heart rate, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure) were collected.

The postoperative verbal rating scale score, the time of the fi rst rescue analgesia, the total dose of rescue analgesia, and adverse effects were recorded for all patients in the fi rst 24 h after surgery.

Results The total verbal rating scale score and the need for rescue analgesia were signifi cantly less in group A and group B than in group C, indicating better analgesia.

There was no signifi cant difference between the three groups in itching or the sedation score.

Group C had a higher incidence of vomiting than groups A and B, whereas there was delayed ambulation in group A in comparison with the other groups.

Conclusion A single caudal epidural injection of morphine is a safe, simple, and effective technique that provides prolonged postoperative duration of analgesia with fewer analgesic requirements postoperatively with earlier patients’ ambulation without occurrence of any hemodynamic changes or increased incidence of adverse effects in lumber laminectomy surgeries

American Psychological Association (APA)

Husayn, Id Mansi Muhammad& Muhammad, Jihan Sayf al-Nasr& al-Shair, Ahmad Najah al-Husayni& Abd al-Aziz, Abd al-Aziz Abd Allah& Muharram, Asim Adil. 2016. Efficacy of sacral epidural blockade with bupivacaine versus morphine as pre-emptive analgesia for lumbar laminectomy surgeries. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology،Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.260-266.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688361

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Husayn, Id Mansi Muhammad…[et al.]. Efficacy of sacral epidural blockade with bupivacaine versus morphine as pre-emptive analgesia for lumbar laminectomy surgeries. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology Vol. 9, no. 2 (Apr. / Jun. 2016), pp.260-266.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688361

American Medical Association (AMA)

Husayn, Id Mansi Muhammad& Muhammad, Jihan Sayf al-Nasr& al-Shair, Ahmad Najah al-Husayni& Abd al-Aziz, Abd al-Aziz Abd Allah& Muharram, Asim Adil. Efficacy of sacral epidural blockade with bupivacaine versus morphine as pre-emptive analgesia for lumbar laminectomy surgeries. Ain Shams Journal of Anesthesiology. 2016. Vol. 9, no. 2, pp.260-266.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-688361

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 266

Record ID

BIM-688361