Early versus delayed oral feeding in emergency intestinal resection anastomosis with or without covering stoma
Joint Authors
al-Fayid, Wajdi I.
Sulayman, Khalid E.
Sad, Fayiz M.
Muhammad, Muhammad I.
Source
Journal of the Medical Research Institute
Issue
Vol. 28, Issue 2 (30 Jun. 2007), pp.160-166, 7 p.
Publisher
Alexandria University Medical Research Institute
Publication Date
2007-06-30
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
7
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
Background : Early oral feeding is an essential part of fast track surgery which has evolved as a result of coordinated effort to combine recent evidence based advances in the modern care of surgical patients.
Fast track rehabilitation or enhanced recovery after surgery is a multimodal program aiming at enhancing postoperative recovery and outcome.
Objective : This study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of early oral feeding which is an integral part of fast track rehabilitation program versus delayed oral feeding in emergency cases undergoing small or large intestinal resection anastomosis with or without covering stoma.
Methods : This study included 40 patients who underwent urgent intestinal resection with or without covering stoma.
They were randomly allocated into two groups, group (A) included 20 patients with early oral feeding and group (B) with delayed oral feeding.
Results : Early oral feeding is safe in the recently performed anastomosis even in emergency situations as there were no cases of clinical anastomotic leak and no increase in morbidity.
Two patients (10 %) in group A had chest infection versus five (25 %) in group B, (P = 0.407).
Three patients (15 %) in group A had wound infection versus seven(35 %) in group B, (P = 0.273).
Three patients (15 %) in group B had burst abdomen, but no cases were recorded in group A, (P = 0.231).
Four patients (20 %) had vomiting in group A versus two (10 %) in group B, ( P = 0.661).
Three patients (15 %) had abdominal distension in group A versus two (10 %) in group B, (P = 1.000).
Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A than group B with a mean length of stay (4.4 ± 2.9) versus (8.6 ± 1.6) days respectively (P < 0.001).
No hospital readmission rate was recorded in both groups.
Conclusions : Early postoperative feeding is safe, tolerable after emergency intestinal resection anastomosis without increase in morbidity and mortality and has a considerable reduction in hospital stay with its physical, psychological and economic benefits.
American Psychological Association (APA)
al-Fayid, Wajdi I.& Sulayman, Khalid E.& Sad, Fayiz M.& Muhammad, Muhammad I.. 2007. Early versus delayed oral feeding in emergency intestinal resection anastomosis with or without covering stoma. Journal of the Medical Research Institute،Vol. 28, no. 2, pp.160-166.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-69295
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Sad, Fayiz M.…[et al.]. Early versus delayed oral feeding in emergency intestinal resection anastomosis with or without covering stoma. Journal of the Medical Research Institute Vol. 28, no. 2 (2007), pp.160-166.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-69295
American Medical Association (AMA)
al-Fayid, Wajdi I.& Sulayman, Khalid E.& Sad, Fayiz M.& Muhammad, Muhammad I.. Early versus delayed oral feeding in emergency intestinal resection anastomosis with or without covering stoma. Journal of the Medical Research Institute. 2007. Vol. 28, no. 2, pp.160-166.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-69295
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Include bibliographical references : p. 165-166
Record ID
BIM-69295