Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience

Author

Muhammad, Asad Kazim

Source

Basrah Journal of Surgery

Issue

Vol. 22, Issue 1 (30 Jun. 2016), pp.87-90, 4 p.

Publisher

University of Basrah College of Medicine

Publication Date

2016-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

4

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Anal hemorrhoid disease is being treated in different surgical procedures, of which two methods are commonly performed; hemorrhoidectomy with sphincterotomy and hemorrhoidectomy with dilatation.

The present study compares between the post-operative outcome & favorability of the two methods.

One hundred patients (66 males and 34 females) underwent hemorrhoidectomy and dilatation for anal hemorrhoids disease were included in this analysis.

After comparison of our results with other studies it was concluded that hemorrhoidectomy with dilatation results in less post-operative pain, less overall need for analgesia and less post-operative complications especially bleeding and fecal impaction

American Psychological Association (APA)

Muhammad, Asad Kazim. 2016. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery،Vol. 22, no. 1, pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Muhammad, Asad Kazim. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery Vol. 22, no. 1 (Jun. 2016), pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956

American Medical Association (AMA)

Muhammad, Asad Kazim. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2016. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 90

Record ID

BIM-697956