Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 22, Issue 1 (30 Jun. 2016), pp.87-90, 4 p.
Publisher
University of Basrah College of Medicine
Publication Date
2016-06-30
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
4
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Anal hemorrhoid disease is being treated in different surgical procedures, of which two methods are commonly performed; hemorrhoidectomy with sphincterotomy and hemorrhoidectomy with dilatation.
The present study compares between the post-operative outcome & favorability of the two methods.
One hundred patients (66 males and 34 females) underwent hemorrhoidectomy and dilatation for anal hemorrhoids disease were included in this analysis.
After comparison of our results with other studies it was concluded that hemorrhoidectomy with dilatation results in less post-operative pain, less overall need for analgesia and less post-operative complications especially bleeding and fecal impaction
American Psychological Association (APA)
Muhammad, Asad Kazim. 2016. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery،Vol. 22, no. 1, pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Muhammad, Asad Kazim. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery Vol. 22, no. 1 (Jun. 2016), pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956
American Medical Association (AMA)
Muhammad, Asad Kazim. Dilatation versus sphincterotomy in third and forth degree hemorrhoid surgery : a personal experience. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2016. Vol. 22, no. 1, pp.87-90.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-697956
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references : p. 90
Record ID
BIM-697956