المعرفة الاستعمارية

Other Title(s)

Colonial knowledge

Author

بالنتاين، توني

Translators

ديب، ثائر أحمد علي

Source

عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية

Issue

Vol. 5, Issue 17 (30 Jun. 2016), pp.13-46, 34 p.

Publisher

Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies

Publication Date

2016-06-30

Country of Publication

Qatar

No. of Pages

34

Main Subjects

Sociology and Anthropology and Social Work

Topics

Abstract EN

Ballantyne discusses how knowledge about colonialism has moved away from being mainly the concern of economists and historians to becoming part of the works of anthropologists, sociologists, and others in the humanities.

In this context, the role of culture increasingly occupies an important place in colonial and post-colonial studies.

Ballantyne identifies the work of Edward Said on Orientalism as pivotal in considering knowledge as a form of power.

Both Michel Foucault and Edward Said ushered in colonial studies the need to study the subaltern.

No longer researchers of colonialism focused on the role of elites, but increasingly took the experiences of the marginalized into account in order to understand forms of resistance, or power from below.

American Psychological Association (APA)

بالنتاين، توني. 2016. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية،مج. 5، ع. 17، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219

Modern Language Association (MLA)

بالنتاين، توني. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية مج. 5، ع. 17 (حزيران 2016)، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219

American Medical Association (AMA)

بالنتاين، توني. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية. 2016. مج. 5، ع. 17، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن هوامش.

Record ID

BIM-718219