المعرفة الاستعمارية
Other Title(s)
Colonial knowledge
Author
Translators
Source
Issue
Vol. 5, Issue 17 (30 Jun. 2016), pp.13-46, 34 p.
Publisher
Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies
Publication Date
2016-06-30
Country of Publication
Qatar
No. of Pages
34
Main Subjects
Sociology and Anthropology and Social Work
Topics
Abstract EN
Ballantyne discusses how knowledge about colonialism has moved away from being mainly the concern of economists and historians to becoming part of the works of anthropologists, sociologists, and others in the humanities.
In this context, the role of culture increasingly occupies an important place in colonial and post-colonial studies.
Ballantyne identifies the work of Edward Said on Orientalism as pivotal in considering knowledge as a form of power.
Both Michel Foucault and Edward Said ushered in colonial studies the need to study the subaltern.
No longer researchers of colonialism focused on the role of elites, but increasingly took the experiences of the marginalized into account in order to understand forms of resistance, or power from below.
American Psychological Association (APA)
بالنتاين، توني. 2016. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية،مج. 5، ع. 17، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219
Modern Language Association (MLA)
بالنتاين، توني. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية مج. 5، ع. 17 (حزيران 2016)، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219
American Medical Association (AMA)
بالنتاين، توني. المعرفة الاستعمارية. عمران للعلوم الاجتماعية. 2016. مج. 5، ع. 17، ص ص. 13-46.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-718219
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-718219