الركن المادي لجريمة شهادة الزور في قانون العقوبات الأردني و المصري : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Abstract EN

The aim of this study، the comparative analysis to demonstrate the impact of reversal of perjury in the Jordanian Penal Code No.

16 For the year 1960،as amended.

Where is the testimony and the means of proof in criminal matters and the most common، because they focus on the facts of occasional transient fall suddenly، and be prepared in advance to prove not preceded by a compromise or agreement by the parties.

the Jordanian law founder does not require the occurrence of fake testimony in court، but also can occur before the primary investigating authorities، in addition to the possibility of their occurrence before the officer or body has the power to hear witnesses، jury.

This is confirmed by the material 214 and 215 of the Jordanian Penal Code.

The Jordanian law founder is not considering the oath of the pillars of the crime of perjury as a crime against justice، not against religion، contrary to what it is in Egyptian legislation، which is the oath، one of the pillars of perjury، as a crime against religion is not against justice.