تقويم برامج جامعة القصيم للدراسات العليا في ضوء معايير الهيئة الوطنية للتقويم و الاعتماد الأكاديمي (NCAAA)
Other Title(s)
Evaluation of Al-Qassim University graduate studies’ programs based on NCAAA accreditation standards
Joint Authors
الحياصات، خالد محمد الحسن
بني عامر، أيمن عمر عبد الغني
Source
مجلة جامعة طيبة للعلوم التربوية
Issue
Vol. 11, Issue 3 (31 Oct. 2016), pp.445-464, 20 p.
Publisher
Taibah University College of Education
Publication Date
2016-10-31
Country of Publication
Saudi Arabia
No. of Pages
20
Main Subjects
Topics
- Universities
- Education
- Higher education
- Students
- Educational programmes
- Educational quality
- Educational evaluation
- Academic degrees
- 13
- 17
- Saudi Arabia
- Standards
- Accreditation
- al-Qussaim University
Abstract EN
Based on the National Commission for Assessment and Academic Accreditation (NCAAA) standards, this study was conducted to evaluate Sharia and Islamic Studies graduate program at Al-Qassim University as perceived by teaching staff and students.
The following variables were used: gender, academic rank, department to which students are affiliated, academic staff’s years of experience.
The study employed the analytical descriptive approach.
Two surveys were developed: the first one for teaching staff with (54) items and the second one for students with (41) items.
Items were grouped into five fields (learning and teaching, student administration and support services, learning resources, facilities and equipment and research).
Having verified their validity and reliability, the surveys were administered to a population sample of (29) teaching staff members and (55) students.
Findings revealed that quality assurance and academic accreditation standards are largely satisfied from the perspective of teaching staff members and moderately satisfied from the students’ perspective.
Also, results showed the presence of statistically significant differences in the field of student management and support services in academic staff’s responses that can be attributed to gender variable in favor of females, as well as in the field of academic rank, but Scheffe test could not determine their direction.
No differences could be attributed to the rest of variables in all study fields.
Also, findings revealed statistically significant differences amongst students’ responses which could be attributed to the gender variable in areas relevant to facilities and equipment in favor of male students.
No differences could be attributed to the department to which students are affiliated.
Except the research domain, results identified statistically significant differences between teaching staff’s and students’ perspectives in the shared (30 items) and in all study fields in favor of teaching staff.
In light of the study results, a list of recommendations is proposed to whom it may concern.
American Psychological Association (APA)
الحياصات، خالد محمد الحسن وبني عامر، أيمن عمر عبد الغني. 2016. تقويم برامج جامعة القصيم للدراسات العليا في ضوء معايير الهيئة الوطنية للتقويم و الاعتماد الأكاديمي (NCAAA). مجلة جامعة طيبة للعلوم التربوية،مج. 11، ع. 3، ص ص. 445-464.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-747509
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الحياصات، خالد محمد الحسن وبني عامر، أيمن عمر عبد الغني. تقويم برامج جامعة القصيم للدراسات العليا في ضوء معايير الهيئة الوطنية للتقويم و الاعتماد الأكاديمي (NCAAA). مجلة جامعة طيبة للعلوم التربوية مج. 11، ع. 3 (تشرين الأول 2016)، ص ص. 445-464.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-747509
American Medical Association (AMA)
الحياصات، خالد محمد الحسن وبني عامر، أيمن عمر عبد الغني. تقويم برامج جامعة القصيم للدراسات العليا في ضوء معايير الهيئة الوطنية للتقويم و الاعتماد الأكاديمي (NCAAA). مجلة جامعة طيبة للعلوم التربوية. 2016. مج. 11، ع. 3، ص ص. 445-464.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-747509
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن مراجع ببليوجرافية : ص. 462-463
Record ID
BIM-747509