![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
جدلية التاريخ و العلم
Other Title(s)
The dialectic of history and science
Author
Source
مجلة الأستاذ للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية
Issue
Vol. 2, Issue 222 (30 Sep. 2017), pp.27-44, 18 p.
Publisher
University of Baghdad College of Education for Human Science / Ibn Rushd
Publication Date
2017-09-30
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
18
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
Scientific research is characterized by rigor, methodology and objectivity, and requires a lot of attention and care.
It calls for continuous efforts and great ability of imagination, perseverance and self-control.
But before the develloping the scientific approach in its current form, mankind used another kind of thinking, known philosophical thinking .
If the scientific thinking is judged as organized and unified thinking, this does not mean that philosophical thinking is unorganized.
It is a thinking subject to logical standards, and take into account the consistency of introductions with the final results.
Moreover, the philosophical thinking gives more freedom to the mind and less constrained by the standard and controls and it is characterized by a kind of totalitarianism.
The separation of scientific thinking came after the maturity of scientific methods, which rationalized and quantified the phenomena and their interpretations.
The maturuty of the scientific thinking comes from the succes of natural Sciences, which dealt with realistic physical phenomena and it based on scientistic experimental approach as a way to understand and interpret physical phenomena.
After the stunning success of the natural sciences, some scientists and thinkers try the application of the experimental methods in the study of historical phenomena which led to the separation between the history of the philosophy.
However, the history subjects differ from those of the natural sciences.
they are more complex and interconnected, and this is what made the scientific study of the historical phenomena known several epistemological obstacles preventing the rationalization of the historical phenomena, driving a skepticism in the value of the science of history and its ability to interpret historical phenomena using only scientific explanation without the philosophical interpretation.
or is it that historical studies should return to the field of philosophy.
This is what I tried to explain it through this article that addresses the following issue: Did the historical studies respect canonical scientific approach?.
American Psychological Association (APA)
الدراجي، زروخي. 2017. جدلية التاريخ و العلم. مجلة الأستاذ للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية،مج. 2، ع. 222، ص ص. 27-44.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-758341
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الدراجي، زروخي. جدلية التاريخ و العلم. مجلة الأستاذ للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية مج. 2، ع. 222 (2017)، ص ص. 27-44.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-758341
American Medical Association (AMA)
الدراجي، زروخي. جدلية التاريخ و العلم. مجلة الأستاذ للعلوم الإنسانية و الاجتماعية. 2017. مج. 2، ع. 222، ص ص. 27-44.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-758341
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن مراجع ببليوجرافية.
Record ID
BIM-758341