قاعدة مسوغات الابتداء بالنكرة بين الإبقاء و الاستغناء

Abstract EN

This research paper is about a grammatical rule that relates to aspect of nominal sentence that grammarians called «rules» that allow sentence to start with an indefinite noun.

The research covers those rules and what was detailed by the past grammarians.

What they detailed was more than what they did upon any grammatical rule.

It also tried to cover the factors that warrant starting a nominal sentence with an indefinite article, their types that consist of a common relation that connect them intending simplify searching and studying them.

The paper began to search for those factors and the idea that were built upon.

That was to derive clear view that will side one of the thesis: The coverage of those factors will help in language usage so that they will become concrete rules that could not be ignored.

And the other is that those factors could open door for starting sentence with an indefinite article outside what was documented by the grammarians.

Those postulated rules will have little effects on practical aspect in reality.

This helps not distract learner and putting burdens and difficulty when he or she tries to find their status in sentences which will help him judging their correct and incorrect usages.

This research will go against those classical conservative grammarians that are trying to stick to the former rules and whatever they provided as their proofs they adhere to.

Some of the modern grammarians share their view and Cairo convention that cemented documenting the vagueness of those rules.

The research depended upon the social communication proving why news editors inclined to use in their headlines and whatever indefinite article occurred the newspapers headlines that carried proofs even if they contained them.