مشروعية التأويل في تلقي النص القرآني على ضوء قوانين النحو

Abstract EN

Because the Qur'aanic text is inimitable artistical structure surrounded with external different facts, it became distinguished with matchless semantica richness Then the development contributed to the increasing of this semantic richness.

TheQur'aanic texts were subject to different interpretaions that enrich the Islamic Arabic culture .

Hence the target of analysing the legislativetexts is to attain the accurate semantic denotation through the components of meaning, the syntactic issues are mixed with the indicative structure and were the essential aid in directing the interpreters understanding.

We will present examples of some Holly verses interpretations, that reflect the legality of juristic variance which is based on the interpreting of the textual denotation mixed with the syntactic issues, to demonstrate the relationship between the semantic meaning and the syntactic aspect the nature of the approved evidences, the legality of variant opinions, and the purpose of this variance.

We will demonstrate three texts which deal with resemblence judgement and interpretation legality, the judgement of refugee to the Meccan Sanctuary, the obligation of Hajj ,the repentance acceptance, and the judgement of the one who has tie of marriage of a divorced woman.

The research tackles many methodical matters such as the satisfaction of opinions that related to the syntactical aspect in directing juristic denotation ,figuring out the assumed structure which the interpretation leads to , and the legality of interpretation in the light of grammatical rules and the textual data, and satisfaction with the most eminent evidences.The research handled the most important juristic references of Sunni concept, and didn't aim at scrutinize opinions because the purpose is to find out the legality of interpretation in the light of grammatical rules with a body of textual data which form the meaning to the jurist away from the specific tracing to show the efforts of some scholars or a specific juristic school of thoughts.