حجية الشيء المقضي به و حق المحكوم عليه في طلب إعادة النظر

Author

معزي، أمال

Source

مجلة العلوم الإنسانية

Issue

Vol. ب, Issue 47 (30 Jun. 2017), pp.409-417, 9 p.

Publisher

University of Mentouri

Publication Date

2017-06-30

Country of Publication

Algeria

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Law

Abstract EN

In a panel case, the final verdict has in hand strong provided evidence according to which it has been sentenced.

Such a verdict represents the facts of the case in hand.

However, it does not reflect the actual facts.

This results in causing serious damage to the sentenced person who could later prove to be innocent after having pronounced the final verdict condemning them.

In such circumstances, justice could only be done by repairing the damage caused to the sentenced person.

This involves requesting a certiorari as a recourse procedure that is supposed to reveal the actual facts of the case, and repair the damage caused to the sentenced person; who proves to be innocent according to what has been set up in the rules laid down in the Algerian code of criminal procedures (Article 531 Rule N° 01- 08 of June 26th 2001) .

American Psychological Association (APA)

معزي، أمال. 2017. حجية الشيء المقضي به و حق المحكوم عليه في طلب إعادة النظر. مجلة العلوم الإنسانية،مج. ب، ع. 47، ص ص. 409-417.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-792920

Modern Language Association (MLA)

معزي، أمال. حجية الشيء المقضي به و حق المحكوم عليه في طلب إعادة النظر. مجلة العلوم الإنسانية مج. ب، ع. 47 (حزيران 2017)، ص ص. 409-417.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-792920

American Medical Association (AMA)

معزي، أمال. حجية الشيء المقضي به و حق المحكوم عليه في طلب إعادة النظر. مجلة العلوم الإنسانية. 2017. مج. ب، ع. 47، ص ص. 409-417.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-792920

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن مراجع ببليوجرافية.

Record ID

BIM-792920