Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer
Joint Authors
al-Luaybi, Abu Talib B.
al-Wajih, Ali Yusuf
Muhammad, Mansur Amin
Source
Issue
Vol. 23, Issue 2 (31 Dec. 2017), pp.53-61, 9 p.
Publisher
University of Basrah College of Medicine
Publication Date
2017-12-31
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
9
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Peptic ulcer is the most common GIT disorder with a prevalence of 2 %, peaking around the age of 70 years.
Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer began to evolve and replace the ordinary upper laparotomy.
We studied 47 patients suffering from perforated duodenal or gastric ulcer in Al-Mawanee General Hospital in Basrah in the period 2014-2017, the patients were categorized into 2 groups: 1st group(24 patients) managed laparoscopically and the 2nd group (23 patients) managed by open approach.
Perforation found to occur more with duodenal ulcer (29 pt.
61.70 %) and more in male patients (26 pt.
55.33 %).
The peak perforation seen in age group > 60 years and the commonest risk factors was the NSAIDs usage.
Operative time was insignificantly longer in laparoscopic approach.
However, the laparoscopic approach has less post operative pain and less overall complications (4 pt.
16.6 % vs.
8 pt.
34.7 %).
In conclusion, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a feasible operation and considered promising with less postoperative pain, less postoperative complications and better cosmetic results.
American Psychological Association (APA)
al-Luaybi, Abu Talib B.& al-Wajih, Ali Yusuf& Muhammad, Mansur Amin. 2017. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Basrah Journal of Surgery،Vol. 23, no. 2, pp.53-61.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-837831
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Muhammad, Mansur Amin…[et al.]. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Basrah Journal of Surgery Vol. 23, no. 2 (Dec. 2017), pp.53-61.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-837831
American Medical Association (AMA)
al-Luaybi, Abu Talib B.& al-Wajih, Ali Yusuf& Muhammad, Mansur Amin. Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Basrah Journal of Surgery. 2017. Vol. 23, no. 2, pp.53-61.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-837831
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references : p. 61
Record ID
BIM-837831