أثر الفقه المقارن في مؤلفات المالكية

Abstract EN

The article deals with the comparative jurisprudence in compilations of Maalikis, which is an important issue that it pushing back the intolerance charge Maliki to the opinion of Imam without proof.

By extrapolating these books, it seems distinguish and superiority of Maalikis in the jurisprudence of the dispute since the first covenant witch they opened up to the dissenting opinion.

Three methods have appeared in the field of comparative jurisprudence: the Hajaji dialectical approach, Athari and Taassili approach.With this approach Fiqh al-Maliki has evolved and its jurisprudential assets have expanded.