مدى حجية النكول عن اليمين أمام القاضي في الفقه الإسلامي
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 3, Issue 2 (31 Dec. 2017)21 p.
Publisher
Publication Date
2017-12-31
Country of Publication
Algeria
No. of Pages
21
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
This topic is about the authority of the judge in the judgment which is based on rejecting the oath of the defendant who was sworn in though the means of proof where as the swearing is considered as the clues at the extend of the need of the reject oath in a confrontation of the judge.
There are those who saw that the judge forbid the jurisdiction of judiciary while others saw the need to eliminate the villain on reject the oath or force the defendant to the alliance to resolve the dispute.
The jurisprudence did not agree on the status of immorality among the means of proof.
Some of them saw it as a confirmation and some of them saw it as evidence and some of those who saw that he was a believer and others saw it as proof of the evidence and there are those who see that is not missing because it is permissible
American Psychological Association (APA)
قربة، رضا. 2017. مدى حجية النكول عن اليمين أمام القاضي في الفقه الإسلامي. مجلة الدراسات القانونية،مج. 3، ع. 2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-868224
Modern Language Association (MLA)
قربة، رضا. مدى حجية النكول عن اليمين أمام القاضي في الفقه الإسلامي. مجلة الدراسات القانونية مج. 3، ع. 2 (2017).
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-868224
American Medical Association (AMA)
قربة، رضا. مدى حجية النكول عن اليمين أمام القاضي في الفقه الإسلامي. مجلة الدراسات القانونية. 2017. مج. 3، ع. 2.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-868224
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-868224