ابن رشد بين التنظير المنهجي للمعرفة و الالتزام الإبستيمولوجي بالمنهج البرهاني

Abstract EN

Ibn Rochd, in establishing his theory of knowledge, has shown that it is a human possibility available to every person whose truth is his goal, and knew how to use and exploit various cognitive tools that are available to him; from which he can gradually establish certainty, the fact that the senses alone, despite their importance, are not enough, and this applies to reason, because it is grateful in power and not in action, unless it pleads with the sensory data that it transforms into an abstract reality.

For him, it is the method by which one grasps the truth, that is why he took an explicit position on the different methods and approaches that were adopted in his time; He approved the importance of the method of rhetoric and argumentation in the educational and persuasive process, while helping the demonstrative reason to build certainty, but although they fit a category of people, they are not enough.

not to build a constant, solid, and verifiable truth at any time, either to benefit from it, or to refuse and criticize it; as well as he suggested the demonstrative method, that it considered it flexible and encyclopaedic, and it can be inserted in all the studies and the cognitive researches available for the man, whether natural, theoretical, or divine and religious.

Ibn Rochd was able to embody this project epistemologically; but in a flexible way, he subordinated the demonstrative method to the adaptation and the modification of a subject to the other; the realization of this commitment has several transfigurations, we will elucidate it in this article.