هل كان ابن تيمية فيلسوفا اسميا ? : دراسة تحليلية نقدية في قراءة أبي يعرب المرزوقي لابن تيمية

Abstract EN

Abu Yarub Al Marzouqi believes that the famous Hanbalite scholar Ibn Taymiyya adopts a nominal methodology, indeed, that he sees Islam – which he calls «Neo–Hanafism» – as a nominalist project used to confront the realism adopted by the neo–Platonists as regards their view of Universals: can the universal be verified in reality, or is it an exclusively mental concept? Since Ibn Taymiyya is clearly inclined towards the belief that it is a solely mental concept, as the study shows, the real point of discussion is: does Ibn Taymiyya believe this mental concept is congruent with the specifics of the external world as his writings suggest, or not, as Marzouqi suggests? This critical study lays out Marzouqiʼs reading of Ibn Taymiyya and raise the question: does the Marqouqi reading seek precision or is it a projection that does not correctly express Ibn Taymiyya’s approach to the «universal» and its congruence with external particulars?