Comparison of single and group bored piles settlement based on field test and theoretical methods

Other Title(s)

مقارنة هبوط ركائز الحفر المفردة و المجتمعة على أساس الاختبار الحقلي و الطرق النظرية

Joint Authors

al-Kinani, Ali Majid
Ahmad, Mahmud Dhiyab

Source

Journal of Engineering

Issue

Vol. 26, Issue 2 (29 Feb. 2020), pp.144-158, 15 p.

Publisher

University of Baghdad College of Engineering

Publication Date

2020-02-29

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

15

Main Subjects

Civil Engineering

Topics

Abstract EN

Bored piles settlement behavior under vertical loaded is the main factor that affects the design requirements of single or group of piles in soft soils.

The estimation of bored pile settlement is a complicated problem because it depends upon many factors which may include ground conditions, validation of bored pile design method through testing and validation of theoretical or numerical prediction of the settlement value.

In this study, a prototype single and bored pile group model of arrangement (1*1, 1*2 and 2*2) for total length to diameter ratios (L/D) is 13.33 and clear spacing three times of diameter, subjected to vertical axial loads.

The bored piles model used for the test was 2000 mm in length, and 150 mm in diameter has been constructed in soft clayey soils.

Furthermore, different theoretical methods have been used for the estimation of bored pile settlement, such as Poulos and Vesic's methods and then their comparison with the pile load test data based on the quick pile load test as presented in (ASTM-D1143, 2007).

In general, the theoretical method for estimation the bored pile settlement by Poulos and Vesic's gives higher value of the settlement for the single and group bored pile compared to the pile settlement results obtained from field pile load test data.

Therefore, it is not recommended to be used for soft clayey soils.

On the other hand, Hansen’s 90% and Butler and Hoy’s results may be considered reliable interpretation method to compute the settlement of single and group bored pile.

American Psychological Association (APA)

al-Kinani, Ali Majid& Ahmad, Mahmud Dhiyab. 2020. Comparison of single and group bored piles settlement based on field test and theoretical methods. Journal of Engineering،Vol. 26, no. 2, pp.144-158.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-938236

Modern Language Association (MLA)

al-Kinani, Ali Majid& Ahmad, Mahmud Dhiyab. Comparison of single and group bored piles settlement based on field test and theoretical methods. Journal of Engineering Vol. 26, no. 2 (Feb. 2020), pp.144-158.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-938236

American Medical Association (AMA)

al-Kinani, Ali Majid& Ahmad, Mahmud Dhiyab. Comparison of single and group bored piles settlement based on field test and theoretical methods. Journal of Engineering. 2020. Vol. 26, no. 2, pp.144-158.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-938236

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references : p. 157-158

Record ID

BIM-938236