أثر اختلاف الأصوليين في دلالة صيغة الأمر : دراسة تطبيقية على مسائله

Abstract EN

The grate chapter of principles science was command for its relation by legal assignments which was its source.

The legal evidences, the important things related by the provision of the legal assignment it was the recognition of the concept of command.

When it was the greatest matter for its relation with legislator request from the taxpayers for this is why there is a great deal in it and in terms of its wording, the difference of the fundamentalists and this disagreement has not responded to it as clearly as it should have, but rather has Gwen rise to ambiguity.

You will not be sure during this research that the differences between the theoretical morale and that the meaning of the wording of the command is the same as the origin of its status in the people of language, and it does not act to others except by evidence of the presumption.

And that the name of the matter is an accomplice to the specific statement and the act is not a common one, and the two are united, That the doctrine of the public in the formula it is to do, if he does not act as a presumption.

In the practical matters related to the wording of the order, I choose five issues and discussed them through the doctrines of scholars.

And it became clear to me through the models that I discussed that the doctrine of the public in terms of the wording of the order is what it has to work, and then the difference in the matter and according to the wording often to a verbal dispute is not practical and this research looked to show this aspect.