Spinal stenosis : what outcome should be expected? review the latest evidence using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews appraisal tool (AMSTAR)‎

Joint Authors

Madi, Zayd Sad
Madi, Imad Sad
Muhsin, Jamil Tahsin

Source

Medical Journal of Babylon

Issue

Vol. 17, Issue 2 (30 Jun. 2020), pp.117-121, 5 p.

Publisher

University of Babylon College of Medicine

Publication Date

2020-06-30

Country of Publication

Iraq

No. of Pages

5

Main Subjects

Medicine

Topics

Abstract EN

Lumbar spine stenosis is a degenerative osteoarthritic change.

The common presentations are pain in the lower extremities, weakness, numbness, and neurogenic claudication.

The management of lumbar spine stenosis is controversial.

The aim of this review is to evaluate the best evidence-based management for the patients with moderate severity degenerative lumbar spine stenosis with radiculopathy.

The review included the evidence-based reports relevant to lumbar spinal stenosis and their management (nonsurgical and surgical), with no restriction on patient‘s age or gender.

The exclusion criteria were all case series, cohort, and Level V evidence.

The relevant references of the systematic reviews and meta-analysis were considered.

The quality of the literature was performed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews appraisal tool.

Six systematic reviews were considered in our review for further analysis.

The majority of the reports showed the preferable outcome of the surgical intervention over conservative therapy regarding leg pain and disability.

The complication rate from decompressive surgical intervention was estimated at 18%.

Minimal invasive surgery had a preferable outcome in preventing iatrogenic spondylolisthesis.

The epidural injections were effective.

Calcitonin therapy had no significance.

Similarly, there was no supportive evidence for physical therapy regarding the long-term outcome.

The management decision depends on the severity of the stenosis through the clinical and the radiological finding to improve the outcome

American Psychological Association (APA)

Muhsin, Jamil Tahsin& Madi, Zayd Sad& Madi, Imad Sad. 2020. Spinal stenosis : what outcome should be expected? review the latest evidence using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews appraisal tool (AMSTAR). Medical Journal of Babylon،Vol. 17, no. 2, pp.117-121.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-972601

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Muhsin, Jamil Tahsin…[et al.]. Spinal stenosis : what outcome should be expected? review the latest evidence using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews appraisal tool (AMSTAR). Medical Journal of Babylon Vol. 17, no. 2 (Jun. 2020), pp.117-121.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-972601

American Medical Association (AMA)

Muhsin, Jamil Tahsin& Madi, Zayd Sad& Madi, Imad Sad. Spinal stenosis : what outcome should be expected? review the latest evidence using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews appraisal tool (AMSTAR). Medical Journal of Babylon. 2020. Vol. 17, no. 2, pp.117-121.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-972601

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Text in English ; abstracts in .

Record ID

BIM-972601