تداوليات التأويل لحذف الفاعل أو إضماره في باب التنازع من شرح الاستراباذي على كافية ابن الحاجب

Abstract EN

This work revolves around the phenomena of " Altanazue " in the Arabic grammar and the differing opinions of grammaticians about conflicting verbs, whether it is removed or implied, before it is mentioned or after.

At first glance, the subject seems to be traditional because it of the extensive works and writings that had been done on it, but in addition to that, this work looks at it from a different perspective and from a nontraditional angel by testing a new method which relies on the competencies of the interpreter applied to the linguistic sequences to reach the intended indications.

This method is defined as pragmatic interpretation by Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni.

The tested sample is the chapter of the Altanazue fi sharah Alridii Alaistirabadhii alaa kafiat Abn Alhajib.

So can Alridii's interpretations be considered a pragmatic interpretation? And thus after applying this method and analyzing its contents, this the study reached the following important conclusion: the interpretations of Alridii's of removing the subject or implying it in the chapter titled " altanazue" (conflict) in " sharah Alkafiat " (The expounding of Alkafiat ) Are akin to the pragmatic interpretations as theorized by pragmatics interpretations.