Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block

المؤلفون المشاركون

Onishi, Eiko
Toda, Noriko
Kameyama, Yoshinobu
Yamauchi, Masanori

المصدر

BioMed Research International

العدد

المجلد 2019، العدد 2019 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 1-8، 8ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2019-03-28

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

8

التخصصات الرئيسية

الطب البشري

الملخص EN

Retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are alternative approaches to paravertebral block (PVB) and are advantageous in that they are easier and safer techniques compared with the traditional PVB.

Many clinical reports of these blocks have described their efficacy for ipsilateral thoracic analgesia.

The local anesthetic injection points of RLB and ESPB are the lamina and transverse process, respectively.

Despite the similarity of the puncture sites, there have been no clinical studies comparing RLB and ESPB.

In addition, the underlying mechanism of these blocks has not been clarified.

Recent anatomical investigations indicated that the injectate was distributed in the paravertebral space and spread laterally into the intercostal spaces.

The limited distribution into the paravertebral space indicated that compared to PVB, RLB and ESPB exert their effects via a different mechanism.

In this review, we describe the features of and differences between RLB and ESPB based on current clinical and anatomical reports.

We also propose the clinical indication and discuss the differences, clinical outcomes, and anatomical mechanisms of the techniques.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Onishi, Eiko& Toda, Noriko& Kameyama, Yoshinobu& Yamauchi, Masanori. 2019. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Onishi, Eiko…[et al.]. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Onishi, Eiko& Toda, Noriko& Kameyama, Yoshinobu& Yamauchi, Masanori. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1123922