Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block

Joint Authors

Onishi, Eiko
Toda, Noriko
Kameyama, Yoshinobu
Yamauchi, Masanori

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-03-28

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Retrolaminar block (RLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are alternative approaches to paravertebral block (PVB) and are advantageous in that they are easier and safer techniques compared with the traditional PVB.

Many clinical reports of these blocks have described their efficacy for ipsilateral thoracic analgesia.

The local anesthetic injection points of RLB and ESPB are the lamina and transverse process, respectively.

Despite the similarity of the puncture sites, there have been no clinical studies comparing RLB and ESPB.

In addition, the underlying mechanism of these blocks has not been clarified.

Recent anatomical investigations indicated that the injectate was distributed in the paravertebral space and spread laterally into the intercostal spaces.

The limited distribution into the paravertebral space indicated that compared to PVB, RLB and ESPB exert their effects via a different mechanism.

In this review, we describe the features of and differences between RLB and ESPB based on current clinical and anatomical reports.

We also propose the clinical indication and discuss the differences, clinical outcomes, and anatomical mechanisms of the techniques.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Onishi, Eiko& Toda, Noriko& Kameyama, Yoshinobu& Yamauchi, Masanori. 2019. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Onishi, Eiko…[et al.]. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

American Medical Association (AMA)

Onishi, Eiko& Toda, Noriko& Kameyama, Yoshinobu& Yamauchi, Masanori. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Anatomical Investigation between Retrolaminar Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block. BioMed Research International. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1123922

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1123922