A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

المؤلفون المشاركون

Li, Pei
Wang, Yan
Teng, Haijun
Fan, Dehong
Guo, Zhiliang
Lu, Haijiang
Xie, Dong
Zhang, Dahai
Jiang, Yongtian

المصدر

BioMed Research International

العدد

المجلد 2018، العدد 2018 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2018)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2018-07-12

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

10

التخصصات الرئيسية

الطب البشري

الملخص EN

Background.

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis.

Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI.

However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached.

Objective.

This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI.

Methods.

We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI.

The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results.

Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected.

The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01).

Conclusions.

The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors.

This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Wang, Yan& Guo, Zhiliang& Fan, Dehong& Lu, Haijiang& Xie, Dong& Zhang, Dahai…[et al.]. 2018. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Wang, Yan…[et al.]. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Wang, Yan& Guo, Zhiliang& Fan, Dehong& Lu, Haijiang& Xie, Dong& Zhang, Dahai…[et al.]. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1127613