A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Joint Authors

Li, Pei
Wang, Yan
Teng, Haijun
Fan, Dehong
Guo, Zhiliang
Lu, Haijiang
Xie, Dong
Zhang, Dahai
Jiang, Yongtian

Source

BioMed Research International

Issue

Vol. 2018, Issue 2018 (31 Dec. 2018), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2018-07-12

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Medicine

Abstract EN

Background.

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is a common disease that has high complication, disability, and mortality rates and a poor prognosis.

Tracheostomy is an important supportive therapy for patients with CSCI.

However, a consensus on the predictive factors for tracheostomy after CSCI has not been reached.

Objective.

This meta-analysis study assessed the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI.

Methods.

We searched for relevant studies on the influencing factors for tracheostomy after CSCI.

The extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.3 software.

We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results.

Sixteen eligible studies containing 9697 patients with CSCI were selected.

The pooled OR (MD) and 95% CI of the influencing factors were as follows: age (mean ± SD): -0.98 (-4.00 to 2.03), advanced age: 1.93 (0.80 to 4.63), sex (male): 1.29 (1.12 to 1.49), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A grade: 7.79 (5.28 to 11.50), AIS B grade: 1.15 (1.13 to 2.02), AIS C grade: 0.28 (0.20 to 0.41), AIS D grade: 0.04 (0.02 to 0.09), neurological level of injury (upper CSCI): 2.36 (1.51 to 3.68), injury severity score (ISS): 8.97 (8.11 to 9.82), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8: 6.03 (2.19 to 16.61), thoracic injury: 1.78 (1.55 to 2.04), brain injury: 0.96 (0.55 to 1.69), respiratory complications: 5.97 (4.03 to 8.86), smoking history: 1.45 (0.99 to 2.13), traffic accident injury: 1.27 (0.92 to 1.74), and fall injury: 0.72 (0.52 to 1.01).

Conclusions.

The current evidence shows that male sex, AIS A grade, AIS B grade, neurological level of injury (upper CSCI), high ISS, GCS≤8, thoracic injury, and respiratory complications are risk factors for tracheostomy after CSCI, and AIS C grade and AIS D grade are protective factors.

This study will allow us to use these factors for tracheostomy decisions and ultimately optimize airway management in patients with CSCI.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Wang, Yan& Guo, Zhiliang& Fan, Dehong& Lu, Haijiang& Xie, Dong& Zhang, Dahai…[et al.]. 2018. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International،Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Wang, Yan…[et al.]. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International No. 2018 (2018), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

American Medical Association (AMA)

Wang, Yan& Guo, Zhiliang& Fan, Dehong& Lu, Haijiang& Xie, Dong& Zhang, Dahai…[et al.]. A Meta-Analysis of the Influencing Factors for Tracheostomy after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. BioMed Research International. 2018. Vol. 2018, no. 2018, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1127613

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1127613