SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece
المؤلفون المشاركون
Tziatzios, Georgios
Samonakis, Dimitrios N.
Tsionis, Theocharis
Goulas, Spyridon
Christodoulou, Dimitrios
Triantafyllou, K.
المصدر
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
العدد
المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-9، 9ص.
الناشر
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
تاريخ النشر
2020-10-05
دولة النشر
مصر
عدد الصفحات
9
التخصصات الرئيسية
الملخص EN
Objectives.
To examine the impact of endoscopy setting (hospital-based vs.
office-based) on sedation/analgesia administration and to provide nationwide data on monitoring practices among Greek gastroenterologists in real-world settings.
Material and Methods.
A web-based survey regarding sedation/analgesia rates and monitoring practices during endoscopy either in a hospital-based or in an office-based setting was disseminated to the members of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology and Professional Association of Gastroenterologists.
Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, which consisted of 35 items, stratified into 4 sections: demographics, preprocedure (informed consent, initial patient evaluation), intraprocedure (monitoring practices, sedative agents’ administration rate), and postprocedure practices (recovery).
Results.
211 individuals responded (response rate: 40.3%).
Propofol use was significantly higher in the private hospital compared to the public hospital and the office-based setting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (85.8% vs.
19.5% vs.
10.5%, p<0.0001) and colonoscopy (88.2% vs.
20.1% vs.
9.4%, p<0.0001).
This effect was not detected for midazolam, pethidine, and fentanyl use.
Endoscopists themselves administered the medications in most cases.
However, a significant contribution of anesthesiology sedation/analgesia provision was detected in private hospitals (14.7% vs.
2.8% vs.
2.4%, p<0.001) compared to the other settings.
Only 35.2% of the private offices have a separate recovery room, compared to 80.4% and 58.7% of the private hospital- and public hospital-based facilities, respectively, while the nursing personnel monitored patients’ recovery in most of the cases.
Participants were familiar with airway management techniques (83.9% with bag valve mask and 23.2% with endotracheal intubation), while 49.7% and 21.8% had received Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) training, respectively.
Conclusion.
The private hospital-based setting is associated with higher propofol sedation administration both for EGD and for colonoscopy.
Greek endoscopists are adequately trained in airway management techniques.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Tziatzios, Georgios& Samonakis, Dimitrios N.& Tsionis, Theocharis& Goulas, Spyridon& Christodoulou, Dimitrios& Triantafyllou, K.. 2020. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Tziatzios, Georgios…[et al.]. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Tziatzios, Georgios& Samonakis, Dimitrios N.& Tsionis, Theocharis& Goulas, Spyridon& Christodoulou, Dimitrios& Triantafyllou, K.. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references
رقم السجل
BIM-1167070
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر