SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based)‎ Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece

Joint Authors

Tziatzios, Georgios
Samonakis, Dimitrios N.
Tsionis, Theocharis
Goulas, Spyridon
Christodoulou, Dimitrios
Triantafyllou, K.

Source

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-9, 9 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-10-05

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

9

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

Objectives.

To examine the impact of endoscopy setting (hospital-based vs.

office-based) on sedation/analgesia administration and to provide nationwide data on monitoring practices among Greek gastroenterologists in real-world settings.

Material and Methods.

A web-based survey regarding sedation/analgesia rates and monitoring practices during endoscopy either in a hospital-based or in an office-based setting was disseminated to the members of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology and Professional Association of Gastroenterologists.

Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire, which consisted of 35 items, stratified into 4 sections: demographics, preprocedure (informed consent, initial patient evaluation), intraprocedure (monitoring practices, sedative agents’ administration rate), and postprocedure practices (recovery).

Results.

211 individuals responded (response rate: 40.3%).

Propofol use was significantly higher in the private hospital compared to the public hospital and the office-based setting for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) (85.8% vs.

19.5% vs.

10.5%, p<0.0001) and colonoscopy (88.2% vs.

20.1% vs.

9.4%, p<0.0001).

This effect was not detected for midazolam, pethidine, and fentanyl use.

Endoscopists themselves administered the medications in most cases.

However, a significant contribution of anesthesiology sedation/analgesia provision was detected in private hospitals (14.7% vs.

2.8% vs.

2.4%, p<0.001) compared to the other settings.

Only 35.2% of the private offices have a separate recovery room, compared to 80.4% and 58.7% of the private hospital- and public hospital-based facilities, respectively, while the nursing personnel monitored patients’ recovery in most of the cases.

Participants were familiar with airway management techniques (83.9% with bag valve mask and 23.2% with endotracheal intubation), while 49.7% and 21.8% had received Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advanced Life Support (ALS) training, respectively.

Conclusion.

The private hospital-based setting is associated with higher propofol sedation administration both for EGD and for colonoscopy.

Greek endoscopists are adequately trained in airway management techniques.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Tziatzios, Georgios& Samonakis, Dimitrios N.& Tsionis, Theocharis& Goulas, Spyridon& Christodoulou, Dimitrios& Triantafyllou, K.. 2020. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Tziatzios, Georgios…[et al.]. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070

American Medical Association (AMA)

Tziatzios, Georgios& Samonakis, Dimitrios N.& Tsionis, Theocharis& Goulas, Spyridon& Christodoulou, Dimitrios& Triantafyllou, K.. SedationAnalgesia Administration Practice Varies according to Endoscopy Facility (Hospital- or Office-Based) Setting: Results from a Nationwide Survey in Greece. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-9.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1167070

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1167070