Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?

المؤلفون المشاركون

Pereiro, Arturo X.
Resúa, Bea
Facal, David
Cancela-Carral, José María

المصدر

Parkinson’s Disease

العدد

المجلد 2020، العدد 2020 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2020)، ص ص. 1-10، 10ص.

الناشر

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

تاريخ النشر

2020-04-04

دولة النشر

مصر

عدد الصفحات

10

التخصصات الرئيسية

الأمراض
الطب البشري

الملخص EN

Introduction.

Cognitive decline usually coexists with motor impairment in PD.

Multitask settings provide appropriate measures to evaluate the complex interaction between motor and cognitive impairments.

The main objective was to analyze which concurrent task, i.

e., motor or hybrid motor-cognitive, in combination with a cognitive task better differentiates between PD patients with mild and moderate levels of disease.

Methods.

Thirty-seven individuals (19 male and 18 female) with idiopathic PD performed dual and triple tasks combining a cognitive task (phonemic fluency) with motor (pedaling) and/or cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) tasks.

Mild and moderate disability PD groups were specified considering the Hoehn and Yahr scale.

Mixed ANOVA analyses for each of the concurrent task were carried out to test differences between the single and dual or triple condition performances comparing the low and high PD disability groups.

Supplementary mixed ANCOVA analysis was performed considering the cognitive status as the covariate.

Results.

The only significant differences between disability PD groups were found for performances in the cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) task, both in dual and triple conditions.

Our results showed a better performance for the mild rather than for the moderate disability group in the single condition task and a significant decline of the mild disability group in the dual and triple condition when compared to the levels of those shown by the moderate disability group.

The group-condition interaction remained significant when the cognitive status was statistically controlled.

Conclusion.

The hybrid of motor-cognitive task combining with a cognitive task (i.

e., fluency) successfully differentiated between mild and moderate PD patients in the context of dual and triple multitask sets even when the cognitive status was statistically controlled.

Our results highlight the importance of jointly measuring the complex interplay between motor and cognitive skills in PD.

نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.& Resúa, Bea& Facal, David& Cancela-Carral, José María. 2020. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.…[et al.]. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.& Resúa, Bea& Facal, David& Cancela-Carral, José María. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

نوع البيانات

مقالات

لغة النص

الإنجليزية

الملاحظات

Includes bibliographical references

رقم السجل

BIM-1206406