Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?

Joint Authors

Pereiro, Arturo X.
Resúa, Bea
Facal, David
Cancela-Carral, José María

Source

Parkinson’s Disease

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-04-04

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Diseases
Medicine

Abstract EN

Introduction.

Cognitive decline usually coexists with motor impairment in PD.

Multitask settings provide appropriate measures to evaluate the complex interaction between motor and cognitive impairments.

The main objective was to analyze which concurrent task, i.

e., motor or hybrid motor-cognitive, in combination with a cognitive task better differentiates between PD patients with mild and moderate levels of disease.

Methods.

Thirty-seven individuals (19 male and 18 female) with idiopathic PD performed dual and triple tasks combining a cognitive task (phonemic fluency) with motor (pedaling) and/or cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) tasks.

Mild and moderate disability PD groups were specified considering the Hoehn and Yahr scale.

Mixed ANOVA analyses for each of the concurrent task were carried out to test differences between the single and dual or triple condition performances comparing the low and high PD disability groups.

Supplementary mixed ANCOVA analysis was performed considering the cognitive status as the covariate.

Results.

The only significant differences between disability PD groups were found for performances in the cognitive-motor hybrid (tracking) task, both in dual and triple conditions.

Our results showed a better performance for the mild rather than for the moderate disability group in the single condition task and a significant decline of the mild disability group in the dual and triple condition when compared to the levels of those shown by the moderate disability group.

The group-condition interaction remained significant when the cognitive status was statistically controlled.

Conclusion.

The hybrid of motor-cognitive task combining with a cognitive task (i.

e., fluency) successfully differentiated between mild and moderate PD patients in the context of dual and triple multitask sets even when the cognitive status was statistically controlled.

Our results highlight the importance of jointly measuring the complex interplay between motor and cognitive skills in PD.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.& Resúa, Bea& Facal, David& Cancela-Carral, José María. 2020. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.…[et al.]. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

American Medical Association (AMA)

Pereiro, Arturo X.& Resúa, Bea& Facal, David& Cancela-Carral, José María. Combining a Cognitive Concurrent Task with a Motor or Motor-Cognitive Task: Which Is Better to Differentiate Levels of Affectation in Parkinson’s Disease?. Parkinson’s Disease. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1206406

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1206406