Comparison of two forms of dinoprostone : propess and prostin for induction of labor
المؤلفون المشاركون
Duyub, Nawal
Baha, Iman
Khalid, Layla
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 41، العدد 4 (31 ديسمبر/كانون الأول 2019)، ص ص. 226-229، 4ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
2019-12-31
دولة النشر
البحرين
عدد الصفحات
4
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص EN
Background: Induction of labor (IOL) aims to achieve a successful vaginal delivery.
Dinoprostone is a synthetic prostaglandin (PGE2) which works on the connective tissue stroma of the cervix and makes it favorable for normal labor.
Objective: To compare the two variants of PGE2: intra-vaginal dinoprostone vaginal suppository (Prostin E2) and 24 hours controlled-release vaginal dinoprostone pessary (Propess) for successful normal vaginal delivery.
Setting: Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Bahrain Defence Force Hospital, Bahrain.
Design: A Retrospective Study.
Method: This study included all pregnant women who had induction of labor from January 2018 to June 2018.
A total of 322 women with a singleton pregnancy, fetal cephalic presentation and bishop score ≤4 were admitted for induction of labor.
Fifty-eight (18%) patients received 24-hours 10 mg controlled-release Propess and 264 (81.9%) received repeated doses of 2 mg Prostin E2 vaginal tablets.
Result: A high incidence of cesarean delivery in the Propess group 20/58 (34.5%) compared to 45/264 (17%) in the Prostin group was found, P-value of 0.002.
There was no difference in the incidence of hyperstimulation, need for oxytocin or fetal distress in labor.
Shorter induction-todelivery interval was obtained with Propess, 19 hours compared to 23.5 hours for Prostin E2, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Data was analyzed using StatsDirect software, P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Conclusion: IOL with slow release dinoprostone is associated with increased cesarean section rate compared to Prostin.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
Baha, Iman& Khalid, Layla& Duyub, Nawal. 2019. Comparison of two forms of dinoprostone : propess and prostin for induction of labor. Bahrain Medical Bulletin،Vol. 41, no. 4, pp.226-229.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-910491
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
Baha, Iman…[et al.]. Comparison of two forms of dinoprostone : propess and prostin for induction of labor. Bahrain Medical Bulletin Vol. 41, no. 4 (Dec. 2019), pp.226-229.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-910491
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
Baha, Iman& Khalid, Layla& Duyub, Nawal. Comparison of two forms of dinoprostone : propess and prostin for induction of labor. Bahrain Medical Bulletin. 2019. Vol. 41, no. 4, pp.226-229.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-910491
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes bibliographical references : p. 229
رقم السجل
BIM-910491
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر