الفروق الفقهية المتعلقة بالأعمى : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

The thesis Subject: The issues that the jurisprists have stated on its judge in the right of the blind contrary to the other include: 1- The difference the blind endeavoring in water and in Qiblah.

2- The difference between the blind and the disabled in the Jum’ah prayer.

3- The difference between the blind and the disabled in Alhaj.

4- The difference between the blind and the clear eyed with suspicion.

5- The difference between the blind and the dump in aknowledging of the adultery.

6- The difference between the blind and the narrow minded in the issues of divorce.

7- The difference between the blind and the transgressor in witnessing on the adultery.

8- The difference between the blind and the lame in haring the booty.

9- The difference between the blind and clear eyed in hunting.

The research objectives:  To Indetify the jurisprudental differences related to the blind.

 To Clarify the disputes of the scientists in the jurisprudental differences.

 To Illustrate the understanding the Islamic jurisprudence for the ligitmately compotent.

 To link between the differences and the modern technologies.

 The research methodology: The research has used the methodology followed in the comparative jurisprudental studies including: 1- Decrypting the issues and editing the place of difference.

2- Restricting on the jurisprudental creeds that stated on the difference.

3- Documenting on the contemporary cases realted to the thesis.

4- Interesting in the contemporaty cases related to the thesis.

The conclusion has concluded to: The results:  Proving the judges related to excuse’s owners as the blind as an except for other.

 The Interest in the abatement in the excuse’s owners that don’t means indulgement with them in the other’s rights.

 The modern technology has its impact on providing the difference and criticizing it.

 Studying these jurisprudental differences shows the interest of the sharia with who with special needs.

Recommendations:  To interest in the difference related to the special needs.

 To Work on the Jurisprudental encyclopedia for who with special needs.

 To open genealogical door for the high studies students.