الرجوع عن شهادة الزور في التشريع الجنائي الوضعي (الأردني و المصري)‎ و في التشريع الجنائي الإسلامي : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Abstract EN

This study aims to demonstrate the impact of reversal of perjury in the Jordanian Penal Code No.

(16) For the year (1960).

Where testimony is a way of proof in criminal matters and the most common one because it focuses on the facts of occasional transient fall suddenly and be prepared in advance to prove not preceded by a compromise or agreement by the parties.

The Jordanian law founder does not require the occurrence of fake testimony in court but also can occur before the primary investigating authorities.

In addition to the possibility of their occurrence in front of the officer or anybody has the power to hear witnesses, jury.

This is confirmed by the material (214) and (215) of the Jordanian Penal Code.

With regard to the impact of denying witness for false testimony in the Jordanian legislation, he returned for his testimony about false does not come out his statements from the Department of criminality but it takes advantage of the excuse exempt from punishment.

The Egyptian legislator and the Islamic legislator shall be deemed to insist on the false testimony of the pillars of perjury, denying the witness for false testimony makes it as it never happened.