المنطق و النحو من وجهة نظر المنطقيين العارفين باللسان العربي : الفارابي و ابن سينا

Abstract EN

If the debate presented by Abu Hayyan al-Tawhidi ended with the victory of Abu Sa'id al-Sirafi, the imam of the age in his time, and the logical argument of Matta ibn Yunus, it is absolutely necessary that the person needs the rules of expression without the rules of thinking, as long as the health of speech is nothing This is because the definition of logic at the beginning of the debate as the machine that is known as the correct speech of the poor reveals that the knowledge of Matthew ben Younes in the logic which he translated does not exceed Outwardly, without realizing its essence, as well Not to know the characteristics of Arabic grammar.

If one of the conditions of the debate is science, good knowledge and knowledge of its subject matter, as well as strict control of the dispute, it is not qualified to discuss the relationship between logic and grammar except a world of logic familiar with the characteristics and characteristics of the Arabic tongue such as Al-Farabi and Ibn Sina.