Statistical Uncertainty in Hydrometeorological Trend Analyses

Abstract EN

This study demonstrates the existence of uncertainty in hydrometeorological trend analyses using historical rainfall from Kenya in East Africa.

With respect to the influence of short- and long-term persistence on trend analyses, a total of 13 approaches of rank-based techniques including Mann-Kendall, Spearman’s Rho, and Cumulative Rank Difference (CRD) tests were employed.

Graphically, CRD-based diagnoses of trends and subtrends were performed.

To assess data-related uncertainty, a resampling procedure was applied.

It was shown that at a selected significance level, the null hypothesis H0 (no trend) can be rejected for trend direction while the evidence to reject H0 (zero trend magnitude) is statistically insufficient.

Graphical and statistical approaches when combined yield more influential and comprehensive information for inference than relying purely on statistical results.

Alongside an apparent linear trend, variations in the nonlinear (e.g., cyclical) component of the series may also not be due to natural randomness.

Method-related uncertainty is not negligible especially for series with persistent fluctuations.

These findings shed light on the need to assess uncertainty on trend results.

Furthermore, it is recommended that the conclusiveness of trends be cautiously premised not only on statistical grounds but also on more considered physical and/or theoretical understanding of the hydrometeorological processes.