Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients

Joint Authors

Paparoupa, Maria
Ho, Huy
Schuppert, Frank
Spineli, Loukia
Framke, Theodor
Gillissen, Adrian

Source

Disease Markers

Issue

Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-8, 8 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2016-05-25

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

8

Main Subjects

Diseases

Abstract EN

This study evaluated the diagnostic value of D-dimer, CRP, and leucocytes count to detect an underlying pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with pneumonia.

A predictive model of an underlying PE, based on laboratory markers and clinical symptoms, was our ultimate objective.

Overall 100 patients underwent a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lung: 54 with coexistence of PE and pneumonia (cases) and 46 with pneumonia without PE (controls).

Cases and controls were matched 1 : 1.

Symptoms and paraclinical findings were registered on admission.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, search for an optimal threshold, and conditional logistic regression analysis were conducted.

D-dimer has a moderate ability to detect PE in pneumonia.

Sensitivity of D-dimer was estimated at 97.78% and specificity at 11.11%.

No optimal cut-point has acceptable diagnostic ability.

After excluding patients with sepsis, sensitivity was reduced to 96.97%, whereas specificity increased to 16.13%.

Consolidation in chest X-ray and positive D-dimer predict better an underlying PE as D-dimer itself.

Thus, discriminatory power of the prediction model (AUC of 0.740) is not much greater than D-dimer (AUC of 0.703).

No threshold that could increase the diagnostic value of D-dimer or a prediction model which is significantly better than D-dimer itself was identified.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Paparoupa, Maria& Spineli, Loukia& Framke, Theodor& Ho, Huy& Schuppert, Frank& Gillissen, Adrian. 2016. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Paparoupa, Maria…[et al.]. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798

American Medical Association (AMA)

Paparoupa, Maria& Spineli, Loukia& Framke, Theodor& Ho, Huy& Schuppert, Frank& Gillissen, Adrian. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1103798