Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients
Joint Authors
Paparoupa, Maria
Ho, Huy
Schuppert, Frank
Spineli, Loukia
Framke, Theodor
Gillissen, Adrian
Source
Issue
Vol. 2016, Issue 2016 (31 Dec. 2016), pp.1-8, 8 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2016-05-25
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
8
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
This study evaluated the diagnostic value of D-dimer, CRP, and leucocytes count to detect an underlying pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with pneumonia.
A predictive model of an underlying PE, based on laboratory markers and clinical symptoms, was our ultimate objective.
Overall 100 patients underwent a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lung: 54 with coexistence of PE and pneumonia (cases) and 46 with pneumonia without PE (controls).
Cases and controls were matched 1 : 1.
Symptoms and paraclinical findings were registered on admission.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, search for an optimal threshold, and conditional logistic regression analysis were conducted.
D-dimer has a moderate ability to detect PE in pneumonia.
Sensitivity of D-dimer was estimated at 97.78% and specificity at 11.11%.
No optimal cut-point has acceptable diagnostic ability.
After excluding patients with sepsis, sensitivity was reduced to 96.97%, whereas specificity increased to 16.13%.
Consolidation in chest X-ray and positive D-dimer predict better an underlying PE as D-dimer itself.
Thus, discriminatory power of the prediction model (AUC of 0.740) is not much greater than D-dimer (AUC of 0.703).
No threshold that could increase the diagnostic value of D-dimer or a prediction model which is significantly better than D-dimer itself was identified.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Paparoupa, Maria& Spineli, Loukia& Framke, Theodor& Ho, Huy& Schuppert, Frank& Gillissen, Adrian. 2016. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers،Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Paparoupa, Maria…[et al.]. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers No. 2016 (2016), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798
American Medical Association (AMA)
Paparoupa, Maria& Spineli, Loukia& Framke, Theodor& Ho, Huy& Schuppert, Frank& Gillissen, Adrian. Pulmonary Embolism in Pneumonia: Still a Diagnostic Challenge? Results of a Case-Control Study in 100 Patients. Disease Markers. 2016. Vol. 2016, no. 2016, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1103798
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1103798