Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa

Joint Authors

Sogayise, Phelisa
Ekrikpo, Udeme
Gcelu, Ayanda
Davidson, Bianca
Wearne, Nicola
Okpechi-Samuel, Ugochi
Umeizudike, Theophilus Ifeanyichukwu
Chukwuonye, Innocent Ijezie
Okpechi, Ikechi

Source

International Journal of Nephrology

Issue

Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-7, 7 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2020-10-19

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

7

Main Subjects

Diseases
Medicine

Abstract EN

Background.

Lupus nephritis (LN) can be complicated with requirement for kidney replacement therapy and death.

Efficacy of induction therapies using mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCYC) has been reported from studies, but there is limited data in Africans comparing both treatments in patients with proliferative LN.

Methods.

This was a retrospective study of patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN diagnosed and treated with either MMF or IVCYC in a single centre in Cape Town, South Africa, over a 5-year period.

The primary outcome was attaining complete remission after completion of induction therapy.

Results.

Of the 84 patients included, mean age was 29.6 ± 10.4 years and there was a female preponderance (88.1%).

At baseline, there were significant differences in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and presence of glomerular crescents between both groups (p≤0.05).

After completion of induction therapy, there was no significant difference in remission status (76.0% versus 87.5%; p=0.33) or relapse status (8.1% versus 10.3%; p=0.22) for the IVCYC and MMF groups, respectively.

Mortality rate for the IVCYC group was 5.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up compared to 1.5 per 10,000 person-days of follow-up for the MMF group (p=0.11), and there was no significant difference in infection-related adverse events between both groups.

Estimated GFR at baseline was the only predictor of death (OR: 1.0 [0.9–1.0]; p=0.001).

Conclusion.

This study shows similar outcomes following induction treatment with MMF or IVCYC in patients with biopsy-proven proliferative LN in South Africa.

However, a prospective and randomized study is needed to adequately assess these outcomes.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Sogayise, Phelisa& Ekrikpo, Udeme& Gcelu, Ayanda& Davidson, Bianca& Wearne, Nicola& Okpechi-Samuel, Ugochi…[et al.]. 2020. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa. International Journal of Nephrology،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1172743

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Sogayise, Phelisa…[et al.]. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa. International Journal of Nephrology No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1172743

American Medical Association (AMA)

Sogayise, Phelisa& Ekrikpo, Udeme& Gcelu, Ayanda& Davidson, Bianca& Wearne, Nicola& Okpechi-Samuel, Ugochi…[et al.]. Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Induction Therapies for the Treatment of Patients with Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in South Africa. International Journal of Nephrology. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1172743

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1172743