![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Drip Loss Assessment by Different Analytical Methods and Their Relationships with Pork Quality Classification
Joint Authors
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida
Cazedey, Henrique Pereira
Fontes, Paulo Rogério
Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza
Ramos, Eduardo Mendes
Source
Issue
Vol. 2017, Issue 2017 (31 Dec. 2017), pp.1-8, 8 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2017-03-12
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
8
Abstract EN
We analyzed drip loss in pork by comparing the standard bag (DL), filter-paper wetness (FPW), and EZ-DripLoss methods by weighing the meat juice container and dabbed sample after 24 h and 48 h.
Samples were classified into quality categories based on pH, color, and drip loss.
The relationship between DL and FPW revealed the cut-off of 5% DL as corresponding to FPW of 139 mg; 1.89% when analyzed by weighing meat juice container or dabbed sample after 24 h; and 3.18% and 3.74% for those analyzed by weighing both meat juice container and dabbed sample after 48 h, respectively.
Highest correlations were observed between DL and EZ when the meat juice container was weighed after 48 h (r=0.86).
The EZ-DripLoss method in which the meat juice container was weighed after 24 h was able to distinguish drip loss into meat-quality categories in accordance with the bag method.
Therefore, this method is recommended for meat categorization because of its greater standardization and ease of application.
American Psychological Association (APA)
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida& Cazedey, Henrique Pereira& Fontes, Paulo Rogério& Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza& Ramos, Eduardo Mendes. 2017. Drip Loss Assessment by Different Analytical Methods and Their Relationships with Pork Quality Classification. Journal of Food Quality،Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1176165
Modern Language Association (MLA)
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida…[et al.]. Drip Loss Assessment by Different Analytical Methods and Their Relationships with Pork Quality Classification. Journal of Food Quality No. 2017 (2017), pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1176165
American Medical Association (AMA)
Torres Filho, Robledo de Almeida& Cazedey, Henrique Pereira& Fontes, Paulo Rogério& Ramos, Alcinéia de Lemos Souza& Ramos, Eduardo Mendes. Drip Loss Assessment by Different Analytical Methods and Their Relationships with Pork Quality Classification. Journal of Food Quality. 2017. Vol. 2017, no. 2017, pp.1-8.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1176165
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1176165