Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients

Joint Authors

Lee, Jungsoo
Lee, Ahee
Kim, Heegoo
Shin, Mina
Yun, Sang Moon
Jung, Youngjin
Chang, Won Hyuk
Kim, Yun-Hee

Source

Neural Plasticity

Issue

Vol. 2019, Issue 2019 (31 Dec. 2019), pp.1-10, 10 p.

Publisher

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Publication Date

2019-04-07

Country of Publication

Egypt

No. of Pages

10

Main Subjects

Biology
Medicine

Abstract EN

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS), such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been used in stroke patients with motor impairment.

NBS can help recovery from brain damage by modulating cortical excitability.

However, the efficacy of NBS varies among individuals.

To obtain insights of responsiveness to the efficacy of NBS, we investigated characteristic changes of the motor network in responders and nonresponders of NBS over the primary motor cortex (M1).

A total of 21 patients with subacute stroke (13 males, mean age 59.6±11.5 years) received NBS in the same manner: 1 Hz rTMS on the contralesional M1 and anodal tDCS on the ipsilesional M1.

Participants were classified into responders and nonresponders based on the functional improvement of the affected upper extremity after applying NBS.

Twelve age-matched healthy controls (8 males, mean age 56.1±14.3 years) were also recruited.

Motor networks were constructed using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

M1 intrahemispheric connectivity, interhemispheric connectivity, and network efficiency were measured to investigate differences in network characteristics between groups.

The motor network characteristics were found to differ between both groups.

Specifically, M1 intrahemispheric connectivity in responders showed a noticeable imbalance between affected and unaffected hemispheres, which was markedly restored after NBS.

The responders also showed greater interhemispheric connectivity and higher efficiency of the motor network than the nonresponders.

These results may provide insight on patient-specific NBS treatment based on the brain network characteristics in neurorehabilitation of patients with stroke.

This trial is registered with trial registration number NCT03390192.

American Psychological Association (APA)

Lee, Jungsoo& Lee, Ahee& Kim, Heegoo& Shin, Mina& Yun, Sang Moon& Jung, Youngjin…[et al.]. 2019. Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients. Neural Plasticity،Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201185

Modern Language Association (MLA)

Lee, Jungsoo…[et al.]. Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients. Neural Plasticity No. 2019 (2019), pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201185

American Medical Association (AMA)

Lee, Jungsoo& Lee, Ahee& Kim, Heegoo& Shin, Mina& Yun, Sang Moon& Jung, Youngjin…[et al.]. Different Brain Connectivity between Responders and Nonresponders to Dual-Mode Noninvasive Brain Stimulation over Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices in Stroke Patients. Neural Plasticity. 2019. Vol. 2019, no. 2019, pp.1-10.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1201185

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

English

Notes

Includes bibliographical references

Record ID

BIM-1201185