![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children
Joint Authors
de Baptista, Cyntia R. J. A.
Vicente, Amanda M.
Souza, Mariana A.
Cardoso, Juliana
Ramalho, Vanessa M.
Mattiello-Sverzut, Ana C.
Source
Rehabilitation Research and Practice
Issue
Vol. 2020, Issue 2020 (31 Dec. 2020), pp.1-7, 7 p.
Publisher
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
Publication Date
2020-08-20
Country of Publication
Egypt
No. of Pages
7
Main Subjects
Abstract EN
Introduction.
Research and clinical settings use the 10-meter walk test (10MWT) to measure locomotor capacity with considerable methodological diversity.
Comparison between healthy and disabled children is frequent; however, the reproducibility of 10MWT using different methods is unknown.
Objectives.
This study analysed intrasubject, test-retest reliability, and agreement of four methods of 10MWT, exploring the influence of pace, acceleration-deceleration phases, and anthropometric measurements when calculating mean velocity.
Methods.
This cross-sectional study evaluated 120 typical children, both sexes, aged 6, 8, 10, and 12 (n=30 for each age).
The mean times and velocities of the path (10 m) and middle path (6 m) obtained at a self-selected and fast pace were analysed.
Initial assessment and another after seven days recorded three measurements per method (sV6 = self-selected pace and 6 m; sV10 = self-selected pace and 10 m; fV6 = fast pace and 6 m; fV10 = fast pace and 10 m).
Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), multiple regression, and Snedecor-F test (5% significance level) were used.
Results.
The fV10 method had high intrasubject reliability for all tested ages (0.70 The test-retest reliability at sV10 and fV10 was moderate for ages 6, 8, and 12 (0.50 There was no agreement between methods: sV6 versus sV10 (mean difference=0.91 m/s; SEM=0.036); fV6 versus fV10 (mean difference=1.70; SEM=0.046). The fV6 method versus fV10 overestimated the velocity (bias=1.70 m/s). Conclusions. For typical children, the method that ensured the highest intrasubject reliability used fast pace and 10 m. Moreover, test-retest reliability increased when adopting 10 m at both self-selected and fast pace. The methods were not equivalent but were related, and those that did not compute the entire pathway overestimated the results.
American Psychological Association (APA)
de Baptista, Cyntia R. J. A.& Vicente, Amanda M.& Souza, Mariana A.& Cardoso, Juliana& Ramalho, Vanessa M.& Mattiello-Sverzut, Ana C.. 2020. Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children. Rehabilitation Research and Practice،Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207160
Modern Language Association (MLA)
de Baptista, Cyntia R. J. A.…[et al.]. Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children. Rehabilitation Research and Practice No. 2020 (2020), pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207160
American Medical Association (AMA)
de Baptista, Cyntia R. J. A.& Vicente, Amanda M.& Souza, Mariana A.& Cardoso, Juliana& Ramalho, Vanessa M.& Mattiello-Sverzut, Ana C.. Methods of 10-Meter Walk Test and Repercussions for Reliability Obtained in Typically Developing Children. Rehabilitation Research and Practice. 2020. Vol. 2020, no. 2020, pp.1-7.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1207160
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
English
Notes
Includes bibliographical references
Record ID
BIM-1207160