تعدد المفاهيم الإجرائية في النقد الأدبي

Abstract EN

What should be emphasized in this field is that our terminology should be based on a deep understanding of our original heritage, so that we do not underestimate its right when we translate theories and terminology from the West.

As it has to be in everyA term from the presence of an occasion, participation, or similarity, big or small, between its linguistic meaning and its idiomatic meaningIt can be said that the concept of the reader has developed in the modern era to indicate the literary critic, so the frequency of the types of readers in the theory of reception, including the actual reader, the superior reader, the teacher reader, the ideal reader, the typical reader, the symbolic reader, the real reader, and the implicit reader...etc.

Therefore, reading has come to mean that it is a creative act that affects the reading effect with uncalculated possibilities, interpretations and meanings.

It also means that it is a complex and thorny process, which is similar to the complexity of the production or creativity of texts.

Literary.

That is, the reader performs the process of interpretation, analysis and deduction, so there is no harm in using the term reader in the field of criticism to refer to the critical reader in order to distinguish him from the critical listener - that is, to distinguish written criticism from oral criticism.

We infer from this that the concept of (the listener) applies to the critic in the pre-Islamic era, the concept of (the receiver and the future) applies to the critic who is identified with the creator, the concept of (the respondent) applies to the critic who explains literary texts, the concept of (the affected) applies to the impressionistic critic, and the concept of (the receiver and the critic) And the reader) is the dialogue Interacting with literary texts.