المسؤولية المدنية عن أضرار أنظمة الذكاء الاصطناعي : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

Abstract EN

The first seed of Artificial Intelligence (AI) appeared in 1950, by the British mathematician “Alan Turing”, when he presented a practical test, called the "Turing Test", in which he proved that a machine can or does simulate human responses under Specific circumstances whether or not or demonstrate the ability of a computer to demonstrate intelligent behavior similar to that of a human being.

Over the years, AI systems have evolved until they have reached what they are now, as AI has produced many physical applications that work through its systems, so that they have the ability to self-learn from the situations they are exposed to, and to act freely and independently, Depending on the circumstances surrounding them, the most prominent example of these physical applications is: robots, autonomous cars, and autonomous aircraft.

Actually, these physical applications that work through AI systems have had many benefits.

It has been introduced in many areas of life, such as the economic field, the medical field, and the military field, and it has even performed well in carrying out the tasks required of it.

However, AI systems were not satisfied with their good side that is beneficial to mankind, showing their other side harmful to humans and money.

They caused numerous bodily harm to humans, as well as property damage.

Hence, the research on civil liability for damages that could be caused by AI systems, specifically with regard to the basis of that responsibility, and methods of paying it.

An exposure to the legal nature of these systems had to begin.

In the study, I concluded by considering AI systems- at thepresent time- as something- transmitted, due to the difficulty of considering them as natural or even legal persons, while opening the door in the future for the possibility of recognizing a new electronic or digital legal personality for those systems, which differ in themselves from the legal personality granted to the juristic person.

I also ended up preferring to base civil liability for damages caused by AI systems to others on objective liability rules, devoid of error or even defect, which means that it is difficult to rely on two theories: liability for things and liability for defective products, as a basis for that civil liability.